Benue probe panel: Ortom floors Alia at Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal, Makurdi Division, on Thursday set aside the ruling of the Benue State High Court which dismissed the suit filed by the immediate past governor of Benue State, Samuel Ortom, against the probe panel set up by the state government

the Benue State government set up two panels to probe the management of the state’s finances and assets under the immediate past administration headed by Ortom.

In response to the development, Ortom filed a suit challenging the legality of the probe panels on the grounds that the Auditor General of the state had already audited the accounts of the state within the period (2015-2023) under review, and had submitted the report to the Benue State House of Assembly, which accordingly acted on the report as required in line with provisions of the 1999 Constitution.

Joined in the suit as respondents were the Governor of Benue State, Hyacinth Alia, the Chairman of the Income and Expenditure Commission, Justice Taiwo Taiwo, and 11 others.

Ortom also argued that, having reported the situation of finances of Benue State for the period of 2015-2023 to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, it was wrong for the Alia administration to set up the probe panels to investigate finances of Benue State within the same period as it would amount to double investigation of the same issues by two different bodies.

Ortom filed a motion for extension of time to regularize his processes, which was opposed by all the respondents in the suit.

In his ruling on July 30, 2024, Justice T.T. Asua declined to grant Ortom’s application and went on to dismiss the suit, saying the matter was filed out of time.

Dissatisfied by the ruling, Ortom through his counsels, Oba Maduabuchi, SAN, John Ioryina and others, approached the Court of Appeal, praying the court to set aside the ruling of the Benue State High Court, among other reliefs.

In his response, counsel to the Governor of Benue State, Matthew Burkaa, SAN, argued that Ortom’s appeal lacked specific grounds and claimed that the High Court’s dismissal was justified, as Ortom’s case was filed outside the permitted timeframe under the Benue High Court Rules and Public Officers Protection Law.

Counsel to the other respondents agreed with the submission of Burkaa, SAN.

Ortom’s lead counsel, Oba Maduabuchi, SAN, argued that the Public Officers Protection Law, cited by the High Court, did not apply to cases of judicial review, such as Ortom’s.

In a unanimous decision, the three-man panel of justices led by Justice Biobele Abraham Georgewill, set aside the ruling of the Makurdi High Court which dismissed Ortom’s suit.

The appellate court restored Ortom’s suit on the cause list, ordering that it should be heard and determined on its merit.

The Court of Appeal also granted the motion filed by Ortom extending time for him to file his case out of time, and ordered that the suit be returned to the Chief Judge of Benue State to re-assign it to a judge other than Justice T. T. Asua.